
A contrast in momentum and numbers at Van Roystadion
The late-winter showdown at Van Roystadion on 01/02/2026 sets up a clear narrative: struggling Dender hosts a Genk side carrying more attacking firepower and recent confidence. Dender sit 16th in the Pro League after 22 matches with 17 points, three wins and eight draws, and just 17 goals scored. Genk are up the table in 11th with 26 points, six wins and eight draws, 29 goals to their name. The venue—compact, loud and intimate with an 8,157 capacity—will offer Dender a home boost, but the stark differentials in shots, danger and corners paint a picture of a fixture where the away side looks more threatening.
Dender’s recent string of results includes a goalless draw away at Anderlecht and a narrow home victory over Antwerp; those results underline their resilience but also their limited cutting edge. Coach and fans will hope the Van Roystadion crowd can inspire a reaction, yet the underlying stats are hard to ignore: Dender average 92.73 attacks per match and convert only sparsely, while Genk produce 116.82 attacks and carry more dangerous intent, reflected in a much higher shots total across the season. Genk’s Europa League win over Malmö FF on 29 January — where Daan Heymans stood out with an impressive 8.92 rating — further sharpens their appetite coming into this Pro League fixture.
Why the numbers favour Genk — and where Dender can make life difficult
Genk’s attacking profile (356 total shots, 126 on target) contrasts with Dender’s far more modest output. The visitors create more corners and dangerous attacks, suggesting they will apply pressure and test Dender’s defence repeatedly. Yet Dender have shown stubbornness — four clean sheets this season and eight draws — and their most recent home matches have been tight, low-scoring affairs. Head-to-head history adds a little more weight to Genk: the teams met earlier in the campaign with Genk winning 2-1, a reminder that Genk know how to get the job done here.
For bettors who like to study market rhythm rather than lean on emotion, it’s worth reading practical guides on managing your approach — staying calm and disciplined is vital as you decide stakes and timing. A useful reminder on that front is available at How to have emotional control when placing bets?. For those weighing alternative markets, the both-teams-to-score market is worth analysis; strategies for extracting value from that market can be found in Tips to profit from the market of both markers, one of the most advantageous that exist.
Betting suggestion (one clear pick) Genk are priced as favorites with match winner odds near 1.90. Backing Genk to win (1X2 market) is the most logical single suggestion from the available data: superior attacking numbers, recent form boost from European competition, and a favourable head-to-head. If you prefer a goal-related alternative, consider a cautious tilt at "Both Teams to Score" only if odds present value — the data shows a mixed BTTS profile but Genk’s tendency to create chances gives the market life. Keep stakes proportional and use the available bankroll-management principles before committing.




