Stunning refereeing errors marred Newcastle’s 3-1 FA Cup win at Aston Villa, including a clear handball wrongly punished with a free-kick and a red card for Villa keeper Marco Bizot. Betting outcome: punters might back Newcastle to progress but should avoid VAR-dependent props and be cautious on card/penalty markets given unpredictable officiating.
Newcastle overcome chaos and controversy to reach FA Cup fifth round
Newcastle United beat Aston Villa 3-1 at Villa Park in a fourth-round FA Cup tie defined as much by refereeing errors as by goals. Tammy Abraham opened the scoring for Villa, but Newcastle hit back after Villa were reduced to 10 men and seized the tie through two Sandro Tonali strikes and a late Nick Woltemade finish.
Match timeline and decisive moments
Tammy Abraham put Villa ahead in the first half, but controversy quickly followed. Villa goalkeeper Marco Bizot rushed off his line to challenge Jacob Murphy on a counter and was shown a straight red card, forcing Villa to reshuffle before halftime. From the resulting numerical advantage, Newcastle capitalised: Sandro Tonali scored twice and Nick Woltemade added a third to seal progression.
A critical turning point came when Kieran Trippier delivered a cross that struck Lucas Digne’s arm inside the box. Referees flagged the handball yet awarded a free-kick instead of a penalty; Newcastle converted from the set piece. Earlier, Abraham’s goal involved an offside position that would have been reviewed had VAR been in use.
Refereeing errors and the VAR debate
The officiating drew furious reaction after the match. Pundits and former players called the decision to give a free-kick rather than a penalty a glaring mistake, pointing to the assistant referee’s proximity to the incident. Critics argued the absence of VAR for this stage of the competition left officials exposed and heightened the impact of human error.
Those exchanges reignite the debate around VAR’s role in cup competitions: supporters of the technology note it would have corrected clear mistakes, while opponents warn VAR can reduce live emotional moments. Managers and pundits suggested officials appeared hesitant without the technological safety net.
Reactions from camp and consequences
Newcastle manager commented that the match underlined how officials sometimes lean on VAR during normal league fixtures and can struggle when it is absent. Villa staff voiced frustration at decisions that shifted momentum at key moments, notably the non-penalty handball call.
The red card to Bizot was decisive and unarguably changed the game’s dynamics, leaving Villa with a numerical disadvantage for the rest of the tie.
What this means for punters and upcoming fixtures
On the betting front, this game highlights two clear takeaways: teams that gain a sending-off often see an immediate shift in match control and value in match-winner and progression markets; and officiating volatility in non-VAR fixtures can distort card and penalty markets.
Punters should consider favouring outright and progression bets after a sending-off but avoid relying on VAR-dependent props (penalties awarded, offside reversals) in competitions where VAR is not implemented.
Key takeaways
Newcastle advance amid controversy after a 3-1 win at Villa Park. The match featured a red card, a disputed handball decision inside the box that was not given as a penalty, and renewed questions about VAR’s absence in early-round cup ties.
The result boosts Newcastle’s cup prospects, but the officiating fallout will add scrutiny to future non-VAR matches.
Man Utd, Arsenal blow in Tonali race as Newcastle set asking price for Italy star
'It's an absolute shocker.'
Metro
