Breaking: With the 2026 World Cup just over 10 weeks away, USMNT manager Mauricio Pochettino’s late-stage experiment — a 4-3-3 that deployed Christian Pulisic as a false nine — produced a 2–0 loss to No. 5 Portugal and drew sharp criticism from Clint Dempsey, intensifying concerns about striker clarity, team cohesion and tactical identity before the tournament.
USMNT 0–2 Portugal — experiment costs Pochettino in final tune-up
USMNT manager Mauricio Pochettino used Tuesday’s friendly against No. 5 Portugal to test a 4–3–3 that put Christian Pulisic in an unfamiliar central role. The result was a 2–0 defeat and renewed questions about lineup clarity with the 2026 World Cup only weeks away. The loss highlighted weaknesses in attacking structure and left several forwards with unclear paths into the team.
What formation did Pochettino try?
Pochettino abandoned the three-back system that had been a consistent setup last autumn and tried a 4–3–3. Christian Pulisic started as a nominal center forward but functioned as a false nine, dropping into midfield rather than occupying traditional striker space. That shift effectively sidelined the natural strikers — Folarin Balogun, Ricardo Pepi and Patrick Agyemang — from a coherent attacking plan.
Immediate tactical consequences
The false-nine approach removed a clear target in the box and confused role definitions for the wing-forwards and backup strikers. Pulisic’s deeper positioning limited his incisive runs behind the defense and created gaps between midfield and attack. When Patrick Agyemang entered in the second half to provide a conventional striker presence, he couldn’t compensate for the shapeless build-up that had already dominated the game.
Clint Dempsey’s reaction and the morale angle
USMNT icon Clint Dempsey publicly criticized the decision, saying forwards who’ve been performing domestically and internationally have legitimate reasons to be frustrated. His point lands: late, radical experiments can undermine confidence among players fighting for roster spots and minutes. For fringe starters and candidates like Balogun and Pepi, unclear roles this close to the World Cup risk eroding momentum rather than clarifying selection.
Pulisic’s form and the pressure to score
The tactical move didn’t solve a pressing problem: Pulisic remains in a prolonged goal drought. He has now gone 15 club-and-country matches without a goal and eight games for the U.S. since his last international strike in November 2024. Pochettino said he tried the position to “help a little bit” in getting Pulisic on the scoresheet, but the reconfiguration failed to spark the Milan star.
Tactical rationale — and its risks
There are defensible reasons for the experiment. Assigning Pulisic a deeper role could reduce his defensive workload on the wing, conserve energy and try to unlock him between the lines. Yet the trade-off is significant: without a natural striker occupying defenders, the USMNT lost a focal point for counterattacks and set-piece targeting. The switch also forces difficult selection conversations about how many center-forwards to carry and which players can adapt to hybrid roles.
What this means for World Cup 2026 preparations
With the tournament looming, Pochettino is walking a fine line between necessary tinkering and disruptive tinkering. The team still needs a clear attacking identity and defined roles for its forwards. If experimentation continues without producing coherent match plans, the USMNT risks arriving in 2026 lacking the cohesion needed against elite opponents.
What to watch next
Attention now turns to the remaining friendlies and training camps.
Track whether Pochettino reverts to the three-back system that delivered consistency or refines a way to make a false-nine system function with clear rotation and minutes for Balogun, Pepi and Agyemang.
Equally crucial will be whether Pulisic can end his drought and justify a centerpiece role, or whether the staff settles on a more orthodox striker setup.
Donnarumma in the eye of the storm after his reaction to another Italy's historic failure
Final take: the Portugal loss is more than a scoreline — it’s a warning. Pochettino must translate experimentation into certainty, or the USMNT’s attacking questions could follow them into the World Cup.
Si
