"Wyness says Aston Villa will likely avoid triggering Harvey Elliott's £35m buyout, expecting a £15–20m compromise. Punters should consider markets on Villa not completing the full transfer or Elliott making fewer than three more starts this season — back reduced-fee outcomes and fewer appearances."
Villa-Liverpool Stalemate over Harvey Elliott: £35m Clause Under Threat
Keith Wyness has warned that Liverpool will struggle to extract the full £35 million buyout for Harvey Elliott, suggesting a compromise fee in the £15–20m range. The loan structure that triggers a mandatory purchase if Elliott reaches 10 appearances has left Aston Villa with a difficult choice: play the 22-year-old and activate a big transfer fee, or protect the club’s budget and risk stalling the player’s development.
Wyness argues for a pragmatic compromise
Wyness believes financial reality will force talks down from the headline £35m. With Villa operating under budget constraints, a mid-teens to low-twenties million-pound fee would be more realistic and would allow Elliott to remain in the squad without imposing a crippling bill. That compromise, he says, would benefit both clubs and the player.
Elliott’s playing time and the tactical squeeze
As of 10 February 2026, Elliott has made seven appearances for Villa. Manager Unai Emery has been cautious with his minutes, aware that three more appearances would automatically trigger the £35m obligation. The return of Douglas Luiz on loan has increased midfield competition, pushing Elliott further down the pecking order and raising questions about his immediate pathway.
Immediate Sporting and Financial Implications
If Villa refuse to activate the clause, Elliott could return to Liverpool with diminished value after limited game time — a clear loss for both the player and the selling club. Conversely, paying the full fee risks overstretching Villa’s budget for a player who has not yet secured a regular starting role. A negotiated fee around £15–20m is presented as the most logical middle ground that preserves player development and financial prudence.
What Villa must decide
Villa must weigh short-term sporting needs against long-term financial impact. Options include limiting Elliott’s appearances to avoid the clause, renegotiating a reduced permanent fee now, or finding an alternative loan solution. Clear resolution is in the best interests of the club, the player and Liverpool.
Betting Markets to Watch
Punters should monitor markets tied to Elliott’s appearances and permanent transfer outcome.
Markets likely to move:
- Elliott to make fewer than three more starts this season (probability rises if Villa prioritise avoiding the clause).
- Villa to complete a reduced-fee permanent signing (odds shorten if credible reports of a compromise emerge).
- Elliott’s total season appearances and minutes markets — expect lower lines if the club protects the trigger.
A pragmatic resolution looks probable; bettors might favour Villa-leaning outcomes and reduced-fee scenarios while avoiding long-shot bets on a full £35m transfer.
Liverpool open talks over Italy international midfielder deal
Former Aston Villa boss Keith Wyness says Liverpool will not get the full £35 million for Harvey Elliott this summer. Speaking on Football Insider’s Inside Track podcast, Wyness claims Aston Villa ...
Yahoo! News
